Unmasking 'great' directors of Bollywood

Here's a quickie again. I have decided that I'd do more quickies. Writing long posts is a big bore for me. It's excruciating for the reader too! Quickies are more acerbic, just like comments in other blogs.

I have found out an interesting feature about the abusive filmmakers on CNN-IBN. Here I'm embedding the video for you.

You may ask if this is relevant to the objective of my blog. It really is. This story reveals the ugly side of the 'great' directors we worship. We admire his/her terrific knowledge about cinema/ shot composition etc. But can we adore them the same way when we know how insane and abusive they are to their crew members? You may tell me that it's not my duty to sneak into the personal life of an individual. But is this really a *personal affair*? Do the directors we are referring to respect anyone's *personal affairs*? Just as because you are giving them money, you can do just anything? No, it's not a personal attack from my side. Only if I were to get into his/ her private affairs, then you could easily term it as my filthy attempt to animadvert someone personally. Doesn't it feel bad when we watch something good on the cost of someone being abused, verbally or physically?

The most overrated director ever, in my opinion, is Sanjay Leela Bhansali. He churns out mediocre stuff like none else. He is famous for throwing mobile phones at his ADs. He is also famed for not paying his set constructors. There's a lot of other stuff about him in the above link.
The director of, ahem ahem, Eklavya, the-person-who-invented-cinema-and-made-Sir-David-Lean-proud a la Vidhu Vinod Chopra is a bird of the same feather. Why not? After he is the person who gave break to SLB? He bit the hands of his actress (sorry, I am not sexist. But couldn't help) Neha during the shoot of a pathetic film called Kareeb. What the.............!?

There's a lot more incidents of directors persecuting crew members/ actors. Most don't consider crew members as human beings. The directors have bought them as servants like medieval ages. Right?

The excuse they take help of is: "the directors are under tremendous pressure by producers/ distributors." or "To bring out the best out of my cast/crew." So your abuse is justified? Bravo! The question is: Are the crew members too not under pressure by YOU? If any abusive director is reading my blog (That's a daydream
. I know no one is reading my blog), please answer to this question.

There are one or two glorious exceptions. Though I have heard Farah Khan to be a tyrant on the sets there's something about her. I have to admit that I find her comment on so-called 'art cinema as 'boring, dull, senseless etc.' very annoying. What's more, sometimes she calls them 'Bengali Art Cinema.' That apart, there's one quality in her which distinguishes her from other directors. She is the only one in Bollywood, as far as I've seen, who really acknowledges her crew. I was surprised to see in her debut film Main Hoon Naa (I liked the film a lot for some reasons) that everyone from set designers to hair dressers turned up in front of camera in a song. That was a refreshing change. In Om Shanti Om again, she brings every spot boy together with Shahrukh Khan in the same frame. Now that's admirable.

Till now, I don't really find Karan Johar movies as 'totally outstanding or global benchmarks,' there seems to be a 'human' quality in him. The way he behaves is certainly very genial. I've heard that he is quite pleasant with his crew.

Now that's something good.

It's better to see a bad film made by crew-friendly persons than to watch a lost (truly, "LOST") film by Sir David Lean by hand-biting directors.

There's a lot of other directors/ filmmakers whose 'such' actions are no longer unknown. If possible, I'll put up an article about the importance of crew in 'world cinema' sometime in future.

Now watch the video.

Tell me what do you think of these persons.

Madhuri is back with Aaja Nachle!

Well, friends, though I said that my next post would be about Eklavya I couldn't post it. Hopefully, you'd get that by next 2-3 days. So here's a quickie. I'm sounding like just another fan but the ever-beautiful Madhuri is back. The theatrical trailer of her Aaja Nachle is here. My Bolly friend has done a promo watch of this film. It's a stupid post but fun to read. He's just a fanatic about Madhuri. He's done a poll too! That's quite crazy! The promo has been released recently. One of his net friends has done the subtitling of this promo and posted it. The subtitling is just horrible. Watch it! I am pretty much impressed.

Oscars, Eklavya and all that stuff (Part 1)

Okay, I never imagined that my first post after the welcome note would revolve around a film which stars the most overrated Indian actor of all time. Those who have seen my previous comments at other blog surely know how much I dislike Amitabh Bachchan. According to me, he's just an above average actor. This opinion hasn't gone too well with a lot of persons and I got hurled with the worst expletives by them who think he's the bestestsestestest..... actor ever born. I'm not going to discuss it right now because I don't think it's the right time to do so. Let's not meander aimlessly. I'm coming straight to the point.

I don't think I can end this discussion at one go. I may have to say many things after writing this post. Thus, the "Part 1." It may even be completed with this post.

Now you know that Vidhu Vinod Chopra's film, "Eklavya - The Royal Guard," has been selected by the FFI (Film Federation of India) as the official entry to the Best Foreign Language Film category to the 80th Academy Awards 2007. Okay. I should stop being so formal. The thing is, it's gonna compete for the nomination in the Oscars.

I'll let you know my feelings about the Oscars first and then about Eklavya.

Dreading the same kind of animus I came across in public forums, I'd once again asseverate my opinions towards the Oscars. For me, Oscar is nothing but official awards ceremony to honour the leading Hollywood studios. Very seldom do they show true respect towards better CINEMA. Let me cite a few examples to emphasize that.

The classic paradigm would definitely be one and only- the guru of cinema - Martin Scorsese. It's a point which has been adduced to death. Let me join that gang please. This person didn't take an Oscar (for Best Director) until a few months back for his much-loved gangster epic The Departed. Did his calibre as a filmmaker was elevated to a status after this Oscar? The Departed was undeniably a good film. 20 years from now, will there be anyone who will remember The Departed better than Raging Bull or Goodfellas? Academy didn't bother to give away the golden statuettes for that film. So?

Wait. There's even more. The man, Orson Welles, who gave me my name (Charles Foster Kane) and defined filmmaking never won an Oscar for direction. The list goes on. Akira Kurosawa, Ingmar Bergman, Chaplin, Hitchcock et al. Their credibility as filmmakers diminished big time. For sure!

There's even more! Jennifer Hudson, the finalist of American Idol won an Oscar for, ahem, Dreamgirls despite putting forth a very average performance. Pedro Almodovar's Volver loses out to The Lives of Others. Phew! It's incessant.

Now let me come to the point of Indian films for the Oscar. Now I have made my point clear that Oscars are very trivial to me. However, many consider the Oscars to be the only global benchmark for the Indian Cinema. I support them fairly. They are somewhat right. But still, I have points to fight back with my most favourite armour- Satyajit Ray. He's the only, in the truest sense, filmmaking genius ever born in India. I had many an argument with those silly-minded people about the credibility of Ray. Of course, they, sorry, the one was unaware of the name Akira Kurosawa. Quite amusing. Ain't it? Sorry for digressing. Now my questions follow:

• Did Ray become a global phenomenon in his last days when Academy "honoured" him? Or,
• Did the Academy wanted to show its genuineness by honouring the filmmaker who was already a global figure?

Most are unaware of the fact that Academy didn't really show any great interest in presenting the award. Ray fans like Scorsese and others actually encouraged Academy to do so by saying that it would remove the "commercial" tag under the Academy. Hmm...

Now, over the years, the official Oscar entry for India has been nothing but farce. Only 3 of them got nominated. They are: Mother India, Salaam Bombay, Lagaan. We need not tell you that the FFI has a very distinct inclination towards the mainstream Bollywood and producers with heavy bank accounts. As a result, none of Ray's films were ever sent to the Oscars. Very few regional language films were sent to the Oscars.

The biggest shock came in form of the **********,******,******** entry to Oscars: Jeans. It made everything clear.

Now I don't consider Lagaan a classic or a groundbreaking film. Please refrain from vociferation. I felt it was the right and good choice. The next consternation was Sanjay Leela Bhansali's multi-million costume and opulence massacre called Devdas. It was said to be an adaptation of, hold your breath, Bengali writer Sharat Chandra Chattopadhyay's novel of the same name. I can't end swearing.

The next decision which irked everyone was the selection of Shah Rukh Khan's Paheli over, once again, Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Black. Thankfully it wasn't selected. There was such a hue and cry over it. With my ignorance of cinema, I felt it was a miserable film again in terms of writing, performance (AB), setting, direction etc. Moreover, it was such a blatant scene-by-scene copy of The Miracle Worker. Here's a scene for you. 'Nuff for you to decide. Shamelessly lifted!



Paheli, on the other hand, was quite good. Now I don't really agree with Rediff.com's Raja Sen always. Especially since he put Dhoom:2 on the Top Ten of 2006. But here he made a wonderful assessment of this entry.

I fairly agree with all the points mentioned by Raja Sen. Please see the link put above to see the whole article on why Paheli was the right choice for the Oscars. It was an unbiased view by him. Paheli worked big time because of (please don't attack me) Shahrukh Khan's layered acting, the mythological setting and a well-formed screenplay. Black was marred by Amitabh's faulty and hammy acting, excessive melodrama and emotional manipulation. Raja Sen does a better review. Go for it. This not a good summary (by me, of course), though.

So, the 2006 entry was Rang De Basanti. It was again a bad choice for me. It was a good film though. Lage Raho Munna Bhai was a masterpiece and certainly, a much better film.

Too tired for today. I'll discuss Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Eklavya once again in coming days. Tell me how's it goin' on. I'd take any suggestion wholeheartedly.

Best wishes,

CFK.

An Exordium

Hmmm....This note is not to introduce a cinema fanatic called Charles Foster Kane aka Antonio Ricci. I shall evolve with each post. You'll get to know a lot of other things regarding me. Following are the excerpts from my interview with myself. Quite sui generis. No?

What prompted you to start you blog?
Well, I wasn't too sure about starting a blog. Previously I had commented under this pseudonym at a few blogs. On an inoffensive note, I'd like to mention that I had to undergo through a lot of irksome situations while commenting. In this world of self-proclaimed geniuses and "great," "open-minded" persons you get blitzed when you try to shed light upon their misdeeds and flaws. This happened with me several times. I was told to shut up. Even when I showered praises. Some "cinema worshippers" didn't quite understand my name and got into battle with me for my "loathsome" comments. My comments got deleted when people regarded them as very uncomfortable. Isn't that quite good? The deletion of my comments "comforts" someone - this very feeling makes me happy.

But WHY and HOW the blog?
Why are becoming so impatient? Don't question me before I tell you to.

Okay. I'm sorry. But will you please oblige?
Yes, I will. Let me come to that point. When I started experiencing this sorts of events I felt that I should have my own medium to communicate with cinema fanatics like me. Then the idea of blog started enveloping me slowly. There's one my friend who blogs under the signature "movie bug." He's a youthful guy and very enthusiastic about Bollywood, which I am not very fond of. He runs a blog too. But, nonetheless, he's a cute guy. He saw my comments at other blogs and was very impressed. He indeed took all the necessary steps to start a blog for me. I'm very grateful to you, my friend. But he put an amazing condition. He said I'd have to sign the posts in the name, "Movie Bug," the same he uses. I know, this is very hard for anyone to believe. But that's the truth! And I agreed! So my journey started. Throw your next question, please.

This is my last one. What can we expect from your blog?
I have a principal aim to discuss everything about cinema. Just EVERYTHING!! But I hate gossiping about the private relation of stars or discussing what undergarments would two high-profile senseless, idiotic wannabe stars (read, horrible actors) in their high-profile, media-shy wedding. I detest that. But I will nitpick to a certain extent, keeping in mind not to cross limits. I'll also discuss arts, culture or whatever possible. It hurts me when people walk away with accolades which they don't deserve. I'll speak on that in future. But I will appreciate when there's something appreciable. A lot of things will be revealed in course of time.

So let's begin this fanatic journey!!!